I take action by the beautiful reflection of Giancarlo some hasty and perhaps impulsive, and rather than respond to his testimony, which is not seen that I agree with him on the merits, collect and develop some ideas inspired by his reading of the letter published below.
The thought of Giancarlo is a manifesto that should be put together and just can not be recognized by anyone in this Italy, including abstentions, but the mistakes of the Left are there and can not be imputed to Berlusconi or the League. Executives PD persevere, even in these times, in matters that do not interest anyone, but this may be a ploy to not to deal in their own home or to continue vivacchiare.
In Veneto the biggest mistake that the center-left coalition has perpetrated has been to choose a candidate who now refuses with disdain the card of the PD, and this in order to make the "batter free" (ah, I had known before vote!). This nation and this region are full of free batsmen who, alas, play solo, but tragically this has not been realized yet, or pretend that everything is under control despite the abstention.
Very few politicians want to rally around a shared idea, but the majority of these fears, if anything, to do the play strategy, the same as the outcome of the elections after accusing foam: "We lost because you have sustained me," singer and co ... We
voters left, center or right should, according to them, found in this or that political personality and trust in his hands without debate, without objection. But the negative results begin to appear all over Italy, not only through abstention, and I'm referring to the exemplary punishment that the center has received the North. Punishment that would have to dismiss the entire leadership of each party in the coalition (excluding Di Pietro that intercepts the upset), it is not, and now are the usual: look at what it does Fini. What is purpose? The question is lazy, because that would correct what we do, now and in the near future?
There were other questions I would like to ask: Why
Veneto in the primaries have not been made? Bortolussi Why did not you play with the other candidates? Perhaps because he was afraid of being rejected?
So why should he win the election against Zaia?
are questions to which Bortolussi not know / would not want to answer, because these politicians, or man-made symbol believe what boss, and stop.
Veneto abstention has suffered less than other regions, not nascondiamocelo. Zaia was credible, but is now put to the test of facts. We hope that delirium and clerical obscurantism of the early days were tempered with the days and leaves room for decisions which will enhance the work and welfare of citizens of the Veneto. The center
learn from the League to return to the factories, in places where people live, then maybe we could-we-reflect on their own policy proposals.
Someone voted for Cricket in itself is news that should give pause to the majority and opposition. But we do not have a government interested in doing the analysis of voting the old way, rather like (known for legal reasons) to collect the majority vote of the voters who went to vote, dismissing the abstention as a accident. Maybe the next referendum for or against Berlusconi (which is manifested in all elections of the last fifteen years) give negative surprises in this or that part, it does not matter: I do not think the will is to govern the country for the good of the citizens, but for reasons from time to time every single batsman would be of benefit to freely decide their own personal political career.
For now, more than a dream we are dealing with real nightmares.
Denis Lotti, Arcugnano
The thought of Giancarlo is a manifesto that should be put together and just can not be recognized by anyone in this Italy, including abstentions, but the mistakes of the Left are there and can not be imputed to Berlusconi or the League. Executives PD persevere, even in these times, in matters that do not interest anyone, but this may be a ploy to not to deal in their own home or to continue vivacchiare.
In Veneto the biggest mistake that the center-left coalition has perpetrated has been to choose a candidate who now refuses with disdain the card of the PD, and this in order to make the "batter free" (ah, I had known before vote!). This nation and this region are full of free batsmen who, alas, play solo, but tragically this has not been realized yet, or pretend that everything is under control despite the abstention.
Very few politicians want to rally around a shared idea, but the majority of these fears, if anything, to do the play strategy, the same as the outcome of the elections after accusing foam: "We lost because you have sustained me," singer and co ... We
voters left, center or right should, according to them, found in this or that political personality and trust in his hands without debate, without objection. But the negative results begin to appear all over Italy, not only through abstention, and I'm referring to the exemplary punishment that the center has received the North. Punishment that would have to dismiss the entire leadership of each party in the coalition (excluding Di Pietro that intercepts the upset), it is not, and now are the usual: look at what it does Fini. What is purpose? The question is lazy, because that would correct what we do, now and in the near future?
There were other questions I would like to ask: Why
Veneto in the primaries have not been made? Bortolussi Why did not you play with the other candidates? Perhaps because he was afraid of being rejected?
So why should he win the election against Zaia?
are questions to which Bortolussi not know / would not want to answer, because these politicians, or man-made symbol believe what boss, and stop.
Veneto abstention has suffered less than other regions, not nascondiamocelo. Zaia was credible, but is now put to the test of facts. We hope that delirium and clerical obscurantism of the early days were tempered with the days and leaves room for decisions which will enhance the work and welfare of citizens of the Veneto. The center
learn from the League to return to the factories, in places where people live, then maybe we could-we-reflect on their own policy proposals.
Someone voted for Cricket in itself is news that should give pause to the majority and opposition. But we do not have a government interested in doing the analysis of voting the old way, rather like (known for legal reasons) to collect the majority vote of the voters who went to vote, dismissing the abstention as a accident. Maybe the next referendum for or against Berlusconi (which is manifested in all elections of the last fifteen years) give negative surprises in this or that part, it does not matter: I do not think the will is to govern the country for the good of the citizens, but for reasons from time to time every single batsman would be of benefit to freely decide their own personal political career.
For now, more than a dream we are dealing with real nightmares.
Denis Lotti, Arcugnano
